Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Pinotage vs Washington Syrah

How Pinotage and Washington Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Washington Syrah has more floral character; Pinotage has more sweetness; Pinotage has more oak influence.

Choose

Pinotage

Choose Pinotage if you want something sweeter, more oaky.

Choose

Washington Syrah

Choose Washington Syrah if you want something more floral, more savoury, spicier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Pinotagelow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Syrah is more floral: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Pinotagetypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Washington Syrahlow (1/5)

Pinotage is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Pinotage is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Washington Syrah is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Washington Syrah is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionPinotageWashington Syrah
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursbramble, plum, smoke, coffee, dark chocolateblackberry, black pepper, olive, smoked meat, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more