Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Primitivo di Manduria vs Super Tuscan

How Primitivo di Manduria and Super Tuscan differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Primitivo di Manduria and Super Tuscan come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Super Tuscan has more herbal / green character; Primitivo di Manduria has more sweetness; Super Tuscan has more acidity.

Choose

Primitivo di Manduria

Choose Primitivo di Manduria if you want something sweeter, stronger and warmer, fruitier.

Choose

Super Tuscan

Choose Super Tuscan if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Primitivo di Mandurialow (1/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Super Tuscan is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Primitivo di Manduriatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Super Tuscanlow (1/5)

Primitivo di Manduria is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Primitivo di Manduriatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Super Tuscan is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Primitivo di Manduriatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Primitivo di Manduria is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Primitivo di Manduriatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Primitivo di Manduria is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Primitivo di Manduriatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Super Tuscan is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Earthy character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionPrimitivo di ManduriaSuper Tuscan
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury characterlow-medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried fig, blackberry, black cherry, chocolate, liquoriceblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, mint, vanilla

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more