Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Primitivo di Manduria vs Uruguayan Tannat

How Primitivo di Manduria and Uruguayan Tannat differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Uruguayan Tannat has more savoury character; Primitivo di Manduria has more sweetness; Uruguayan Tannat has more acidity.

Choose

Primitivo di Manduria

Choose Primitivo di Manduria if you want something sweeter, stronger and warmer, fruitier.

Choose

Uruguayan Tannat

Choose Uruguayan Tannat if you want something more savoury, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Primitivo di Mandurialow-medium (2/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is more savoury: medium-plus against low-medium.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Primitivo di Manduriatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)

Primitivo di Manduria is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Primitivo di Manduriatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Primitivo di Manduriatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Primitivo di Manduria is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Primitivo di Manduriatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Primitivo di Manduria is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Primitivo di Manduriatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Primitivo di Manduria is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionPrimitivo di ManduriaUruguayan Tannat
Savoury characterlow-medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried fig, blackberry, black cherry, chocolate, liquoriceblackberry, plum, liquorice, cocoa, dried herb

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more