Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Ribera del Duero vs Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends

How Ribera del Duero and Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends has more herbal / green character; Ribera del Duero has more spice; Ribera del Duero has more body.

Choose

Ribera del Duero

Choose Ribera del Duero if you want something spicier, fuller and richer, more oaky.

Choose

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends

Choose Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends if you want something more herbal and green, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Ribera del Duerolow (1/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Ribera del Duerotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendslow (1/5)

Ribera del Duero is spicier: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Ribera del Duerotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Ribera del Duero is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Ribera del Duerotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Ribera del Duero is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Ribera del Duerotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionRibera del DueroStellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black cherry, liquorice, vanilla, cocoablackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, fynbos, graphite

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more