Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Rioja Gran Reserva vs Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

How Rioja Gran Reserva and Vino Nobile di Montepulciano differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Rioja Gran Reserva has more spice; Vino Nobile di Montepulciano has more acidity; Vino Nobile di Montepulciano has more tannin.

Choose

Rioja Gran Reserva

Choose Rioja Gran Reserva if you want something spicier, more oaky, more savoury.

Choose

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

Choose Vino Nobile di Montepulciano if you want something fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Rioja Gran Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Rioja Gran Reserva is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Rioja Gran Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Rioja Gran Reservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Rioja Gran Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rioja Gran Reserva is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Rioja Gran Reservatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rioja Gran Reserva is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Rioja Gran Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rioja Gran Reserva is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionRioja Gran ReservaVino Nobile di Montepulciano
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdried fig, leather, tobacco, cedar, dried orange peelsour cherry, plum, dried herbs, leather, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more