Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Rioja Gran Reserva vs Naoussa Xinomavro

How Rioja Gran Reserva and Naoussa Xinomavro differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Rioja Gran Reserva has more spice; Naoussa Xinomavro has more tannin; Naoussa Xinomavro has more floral character.

Choose

Rioja Gran Reserva

Choose Rioja Gran Reserva if you want something spicier, fuller and richer.

Choose

Naoussa Xinomavro

Choose Naoussa Xinomavro if you want something more tannic and structured, more floral, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Rioja Gran Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Rioja Gran Reserva is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Rioja Gran Reservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Rioja Gran Reservalow (1/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more floral: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Rioja Gran Reservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is fresher: high against medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Rioja Gran Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Rioja Gran Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rioja Gran Reserva is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both high.

Full side by side

DimensionRioja Gran ReservaNaoussa Xinomavro
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried fig, leather, tobacco, cedar, dried orange peelsun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more