Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Ruby Port vs Vintage Port

How Ruby Port and Vintage Port differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Ruby Port and Vintage Port are both made from Touriga Franca, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Vintage Port has more tannin; Vintage Port has more body; Vintage Port has more savoury character.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Ruby Port

Choose Ruby Port if you prefer its flavour profile — black cherry, blackberry, plum.

Choose

Vintage Port

Choose Vintage Port if you want something more tannic and structured, fuller and richer, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Ruby Porttypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vintage Porttypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Vintage Port is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Ruby Porttypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Vintage Porttypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Vintage Port is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Ruby Portlow-medium (2/5)
Vintage Porttypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Vintage Port is more savoury: medium against low-medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Ruby Porttypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Vintage Porttypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vintage Port is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Ruby Porttypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Vintage Porttypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Vintage Port is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both high.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionRuby PortVintage Port
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury characterlow-medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnessmedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at14–16°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, blackberry, plum, chocolate, cinnamonblack cherry, blackberry, violet, liquorice, chocolate

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more