Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Sangiovese vs Xinomavro

How Sangiovese and Xinomavro differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Xinomavro has more floral character; Sangiovese has more herbal / green character; Sangiovese has more spice.

Choose

Sangiovese

Choose Sangiovese if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, fuller and richer.

Choose

Xinomavro

Choose Xinomavro if you want something more floral, more tannic and structured, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Sangioveselow (1/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Xinomavro is more floral: medium against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Sangiovesetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Sangiovese is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Sangiovesetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Sangiovese is spicier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Sangiovesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Sangiovesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sangiovese is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Sangiovesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionSangioveseXinomavro
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, dried herbs, tomato leaf, leather, balsamicsun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more