Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Saperavi vs Uruguayan Tannat

How Saperavi and Uruguayan Tannat differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Saperavi has more earthy character; Saperavi has more sweetness; Saperavi has more acidity.

Choose

Saperavi

Choose Saperavi if you want something earthier, sweeter, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Uruguayan Tannat

Choose Uruguayan Tannat if you want something fuller and richer, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Saperavitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)

Saperavi is earthier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Saperavitypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)

Saperavi is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Saperavitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Saperavi is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Saperavitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Saperavi is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionSaperaviUruguayan Tannat
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdamson, sour plum, blackcurrant, liquorice, tobaccoblackberry, plum, liquorice, cocoa, dried herb

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more