Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Soave vs Verdicchio

How Soave and Verdicchio differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Soave and Verdicchio come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Soave has more floral character; Verdicchio has more texture.

Choose

Soave

Choose Soave if you want something more floral.

Choose

Verdicchio

Choose Verdicchio if you want something rounder and creamier in texture.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Soavetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Verdicchiolow (1/5)

Soave is more floral: medium against low.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Soavetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Verdicchiotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Verdicchio is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium.
  • Body: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionSoaveVerdicchio
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tanninlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at9–11°C9–12°C
Typical flavoursripe pear, white peach, almond, lemon peel, chamomilelemon, green apple, bitter almond, fennel, white flowers

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more