Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon vs Uruguayan Tannat

How Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon and Uruguayan Tannat differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Uruguayan Tannat has more spice; Uruguayan Tannat has more acidity; Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon has more alcohol.

Choose

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something stronger and warmer, fruitier, more oaky.

Choose

Uruguayan Tannat

Choose Uruguayan Tannat if you want something spicier, fresher and more acidic, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionSonoma Cabernet SauvignonUruguayan Tannat
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, cassis, cedar, vanilla, dried herbsblackberry, plum, liquorice, cocoa, dried herb

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more