Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir vs Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

How Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir and Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more herbal / green character; Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more spice; Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more floral character.

Choose

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

Choose Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir if you want something more floral, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

Choose Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirlow (1/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirlow (1/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendslow (1/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is more floral: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionSonoma Coast Pinot NoirSwartland Syrah and Rhône blends
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, cranberry, forest floor, blood orange, sea sprayblackberry, white pepper, fynbos, olive, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more