Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir vs Southern Rhône blend

How Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir and Southern Rhône blend differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Southern Rhône blend has more herbal / green character; Southern Rhône blend has more spice; Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more acidity.

Choose

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

Choose Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir if you want something fresher and more acidic, more floral, fresher.

Choose

Southern Rhône blend

Choose Southern Rhône blend if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirlow (1/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirlow (1/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Southern Rhône blendlow (1/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is more floral: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is fresher: high against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionSonoma Coast Pinot NoirSouthern Rhône blend
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, cranberry, forest floor, blood orange, sea sprayred plum, strawberry, dried herbs, black pepper, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more