Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends vs Super Tuscan

How Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends and Super Tuscan differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends and Super Tuscan are both made from Cabernet Sauvignon, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Super Tuscan has more spice; Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends has more earthy character; Super Tuscan has more body.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends

Choose Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends if you want something earthier, more savoury, fresher.

Choose

Super Tuscan

Choose Super Tuscan if you want something spicier, fuller and richer, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendslow (1/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Super Tuscan is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Super Tuscanlow (1/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is earthier: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Super Tuscantypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Super Tuscan is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Super Tuscan is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionStellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendsSuper Tuscan
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, fynbos, graphiteblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, mint, vanilla

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more