Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Southern Rhône blend vs Naoussa Xinomavro

How Southern Rhône blend and Naoussa Xinomavro differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Southern Rhône blend has more herbal / green character; Southern Rhône blend has more spice; Naoussa Xinomavro has more acidity.

Choose

Southern Rhône blend

Choose Southern Rhône blend if you want something more herbal and green, spicier.

Choose

Naoussa Xinomavro

Choose Naoussa Xinomavro if you want something fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Southern Rhône blend is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Southern Rhône blend is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more savoury: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Southern Rhône blendlow (1/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more floral: medium against low.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionSouthern Rhône blendNaoussa Xinomavro
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursred plum, strawberry, dried herbs, black pepper, liquoricesun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more