Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Super Tuscan vs Uco Valley Malbec

How Super Tuscan and Uco Valley Malbec differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Super Tuscan and Uco Valley Malbec are both made from Cabernet Franc, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Uco Valley Malbec has more floral character; Super Tuscan has more herbal / green character; Super Tuscan has more spice.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Super Tuscan

Choose Super Tuscan if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, fuller and richer.

Choose

Uco Valley Malbec

Choose Uco Valley Malbec if you want something more floral, earthier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Super Tuscanlow (1/5)
Uco Valley Malbectypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Uco Valley Malbec is more floral: high against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Uco Valley Malbeclow (1/5)

Super Tuscan is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Uco Valley Malbeclow (1/5)

Super Tuscan is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Super Tuscanlow (1/5)
Uco Valley Malbectypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Uco Valley Malbec is earthier: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Super Tuscantypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uco Valley Malbectypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Super Tuscan is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Uco Valley Malbectypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Super Tuscan is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionSuper TuscanUco Valley Malbec
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, mint, vanillaviolet, blueberry, black cherry, graphite, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more