Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Super Tuscan vs Washington Syrah

How Super Tuscan and Washington Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Super Tuscan and Washington Syrah are both made from Syrah, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Washington Syrah has more earthy character; Washington Syrah has more floral character; Super Tuscan has more herbal / green character.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Super Tuscan

Choose Super Tuscan if you want something more herbal and green, fuller and richer, more oaky.

Choose

Washington Syrah

Choose Washington Syrah if you want something earthier, more floral, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Super Tuscanlow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Super Tuscanlow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Syrah is more floral: medium against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahlow (1/5)

Super Tuscan is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Super Tuscantypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Super Tuscan is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Super Tuscan is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Washington Syrah is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionSuper TuscanWashington Syrah
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, mint, vanillablackberry, black pepper, olive, smoked meat, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more