Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Syrah vs Shiraz

Are they the same grape, and if so why do the wines taste so different?

The short answer

Syrah and Shiraz are the same variety under two names, so the difference is about where it is grown, how it is made and what each name has come to signal — not about the grape. The main differences: Syrah has more earthy character; Shiraz has more alcohol; Shiraz has more body.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Syrah

Choose Syrah if you want something earthier, more aromatic.

Choose

Shiraz

Choose Shiraz if you want something stronger and warmer, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Worth knowing

They are genetically identical — one variety, two names. The difference in the glass is climate and winemaking, not genetics. The naming convention has become a useful signal: producers tend to write "Syrah" when aiming at the peppery, savoury cool-climate style and "Shiraz" when aiming at the ripe, full, oak-influenced one. The black pepper in cool-climate examples comes from rotundone, which degrades in heat — which is why warm-climate Shiraz genuinely lacks it rather than merely hiding it.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Shirazlow (1/5)

Syrah is earthier: medium against low.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Shiraz is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Shiraz is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Shirazmedium (3/5)

Syrah is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)
Shiraztypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Shiraz is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Perceived freshness: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionSyrahShiraz
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Floral charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black pepper, olive, cured meat, violetblackberry, plum, dark chocolate, licorice, vanilla

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more