Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Uruguayan Tannat vs Zinfandel

How Uruguayan Tannat and Zinfandel differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Uruguayan Tannat has more savoury character; Zinfandel has more sweetness; Uruguayan Tannat has more acidity.

Choose

Uruguayan Tannat

Choose Uruguayan Tannat if you want something more savoury, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Zinfandel

Choose Zinfandel if you want something sweeter, stronger and warmer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is more savoury: medium-plus against low-medium.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)
Zinfandeltypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Zinfandel is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Zinfandel is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Uruguayan Tannattypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Earthy character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionUruguayan TannatZinfandel
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, plum, liquorice, cocoa, dried herbblackberry, raspberry jam, black pepper, cinnamon, raisin

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more