Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Washington Syrah vs Zinfandel

How Washington Syrah and Zinfandel differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Washington Syrah and Zinfandel come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Washington Syrah has more earthy character; Washington Syrah has more savoury character; Washington Syrah has more floral character.

Choose

Washington Syrah

Choose Washington Syrah if you want something earthier, more savoury, more floral.

Choose

Zinfandel

Choose Zinfandel if you want something sweeter.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandellow (1/5)

Washington Syrah is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Washington Syrah is more savoury: medium-plus against low-medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Washington Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Zinfandellow (1/5)

Washington Syrah is more floral: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Washington Syrahlow (1/5)
Zinfandeltypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Zinfandel is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Syrah is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Syrah is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Spice: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionWashington SyrahZinfandel
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black pepper, olive, smoked meat, violetblackberry, raspberry jam, black pepper, cinnamon, raisin

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more