Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

1395 · Burgundy

Philip the Bold bans Gamay from the Côte d’Or

A ducal decree ordered Gamay pulled up in favour of Pinot Noir, shaping Burgundy for six centuries.

What happened

In 1395 Philip the Bold, Duke of Burgundy, issued an edict ordering the removal of Gamay from the Côte d’Or, on the grounds that it produced abundant but inferior wine and damaged the reputation of Burgundian wine abroad.

The commercial motive was explicit. Burgundy’s wine was a prestige export and a source of ducal revenue, and Gamay’s productivity was undermining the price.

The decree was not immediately effective and had to be reiterated, but the direction it set held: Pinot Noir on the Côte d’Or, and Gamay pushed south into the granite soils of Beaujolais, where it remains.

It is a useful corrective to the monastic origin story, because it is a documented, dated, secular act of policy with a traceable and lasting effect on what grows where.

The version you have probably heard

Often quoted for the phrase "très-déloyaux plant" as evidence Gamay is inherently poor. It is evidence that a duke with an export market to protect thought so about Gamay grown on those particular sites.

How firmly this is dated

Documented. Recorded contemporaneously. The date is not in question.

The ducal edict survives. Its wording, including the description of Gamay as "disloyal", is a matter of record.

People: Philip the Bold, Duke of Burgundy

What people get wrong

Corrections this event bears on directly.

What this follows from, and leads to

A timeline is a list; these are the links between its entries.

Sources

Sources consulted

  • Bourgogne Wine Board (BIVB)Bureau Interprofessionnel des Vins de Bourgogne
  • Inter BeaujolaisUnion Interprofessionnelle des Vins du Beaujolais
  • The Oxford Companion to WineOxford University Press

Along the timeline

← Full timeline