Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Wine myths

Orange wine and natural wine are the same thing

“Orange wine is a category of natural wine, and all orange wine is made without intervention.”

Not true

Orange wine describes a method — white grapes fermented on their skins. Natural wine describes an approach to intervention. They overlap in practice and are not the same claim.

The full answer

Orange, or amber, wine is white wine made like red: the juice stays in contact with the skins for days, weeks or months, which extracts tannin and colour. That is a technical description and says nothing about additions, filtration or sulfur.

Natural wine is an approach — minimal intervention, usually ambient yeast, little or no added sulfur — with no legal definition anywhere. A wine can be one, both or neither.

Plenty of orange wine is made by conventional producers using cultured yeast and normal sulfur additions. Plenty of natural wine is red, white or pink with no skin contact at all.

The two are also not the same as Georgian wine. Qvevri fermentation is one tradition of skin-contact winemaking; Friuli, Slovenian Brda and Istria have their own, and modern producers make skin-contact wine everywhere without reference to any of them.

What is true underneath it

The revival of skin-contact white winemaking in the 1990s and the natural wine movement grew up together and share many of the same producers, so the association is historically real.

Why the belief persists

They arrived on the same wine lists at the same time, and both are usually explained by the same people.

This correction is a regional convention

What producers in a particular place conventionally do. Distinct from a regulated requirement: convention is what happens, regulation is what is compulsory, and confusing the two is one of the commonest errors in regional wine writing.

What would settle it: Documented practice in the region diverging from the stated convention.

Sources