Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Aglianico vs Montepulciano

How Aglianico and Montepulciano differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Aglianico and Montepulciano come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Aglianico has more earthy character; Aglianico has more acidity; Aglianico has more tannin.

Choose

Aglianico

Choose Aglianico if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Montepulciano

Choose Montepulciano if you want something fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Aglianicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Aglianico is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Aglianicotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Aglianico is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Aglianicotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Aglianico is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Aglianicotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Aglianico is spicier: medium against low.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Aglianicotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Montepulciano is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Aglianicotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulcianotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Aglianico is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionAglianicoMontepulciano
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, plum, leather, tobacco, ashblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoa

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more