Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Nebbiolo vs Aglianico

Italy’s two great tannic reds, one northern and one southern — which suits you?

The short answer

Nebbiolo and Aglianico come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Nebbiolo has more floral character; Nebbiolo has more aromatic intensity.

Choose

Nebbiolo

Choose Nebbiolo if you want something more floral, more aromatic.

Choose

Aglianico

Choose Aglianico if you prefer its flavour profile — black cherry, plum, leather.

Worth knowing

Both are high in tannin and acidity and both need time, which is why they are so often mentioned together. The difference a reader notices first is colour and fruit: Nebbiolo is pale and perfumed, Aglianico dark and savoury, and neither substitutes for the other.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aglianicolow (1/5)

Nebbiolo is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aglianicomedium (3/5)

Nebbiolo is more aromatic: high against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Tannin: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionNebbioloAglianico
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, rose, tar, dried herbs, truffleblack cherry, plum, leather, tobacco, ash

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more