Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Nebbiolo vs Xinomavro

The comparison Greek wine is always introduced with — is it fair?

The short answer

The main differences: Nebbiolo has more aromatic intensity; Nebbiolo has more spice; Nebbiolo has more body.

Choose

Nebbiolo

Choose Nebbiolo if you want something more aromatic, spicier, fuller and richer.

Choose

Xinomavro

Choose Xinomavro if you want something more savoury, fresher.

Worth knowing

Xinomavro is routinely called “Greece’s Nebbiolo”, and the shorthand has something in it: both are pale, high in acid and tannin, and both smell of things other than fruit. They are not related, and the resemblance is a coincidence of structure rather than of ancestry.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Xinomavromedium (3/5)

Nebbiolo is more aromatic: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Nebbiolotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Nebbiolo is spicier: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nebbiolo is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nebbiolo is more floral: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Xinomavro is fresher: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Tannin: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionNebbioloXinomavro
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)medium (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, rose, tar, dried herbs, trufflesun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more