Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Aglianico vs Nero d’Avola

How Aglianico and Nero d’Avola differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Aglianico and Nero d’Avola come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Aglianico has more earthy character; Aglianico has more tannin; Aglianico has more acidity.

Choose

Aglianico

Choose Aglianico if you want something earthier, more tannic and structured, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Nero d’Avola

Choose Nero d’Avola if you want something fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Aglianicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Nero d’Avolalow (1/5)

Aglianico is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Aglianicotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Nero d’Avolatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Aglianico is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Aglianicotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Nero d’Avolatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Aglianico is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Aglianicotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Nero d’Avolatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Nero d’Avola is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Aglianicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Nero d’Avolatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Aglianico is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Aglianicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Nero d’Avolamedium (3/5)

Aglianico is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionAglianicoNero d’Avola
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)medium (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, plum, leather, tobacco, ashblack cherry, plum, liquorice, tobacco, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more