Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Amarone della Valpolicella vs Barossa Shiraz

How Amarone della Valpolicella and Barossa Shiraz differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Amarone della Valpolicella has more sweetness; Amarone della Valpolicella has more acidity; Barossa Shiraz has more oak influence.

Choose

Amarone della Valpolicella

Choose Amarone della Valpolicella if you want something sweeter, fresher and more acidic, more savoury.

Choose

Barossa Shiraz

Choose Barossa Shiraz if you want something more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Barossa Shirazlow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Barossa Shiraztypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barossa Shiraz is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Barossa Shiraztypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fresher: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both high.
  • Body: Similar — both high.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionAmarone della ValpolicellaBarossa Shiraz
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, raisin, bitter chocolate, cinnamonblackberry, plum, dark chocolate, liquorice, vanilla

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more