Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Amarone vs Valpolicella

Same grapes, same hills — how does one become 16% and the other 12%?

The short answer

Amarone della Valpolicella and Valpolicella are both made from Corvina, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Amarone della Valpolicella has more body; Amarone della Valpolicella has more spice; Amarone della Valpolicella has more texture.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Amarone della Valpolicella

Choose Amarone della Valpolicella if you want something fuller and richer, spicier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Choose

Valpolicella

Choose Valpolicella if you want something fresher.

Worth knowing

Drying. Amarone grapes are laid on racks for months before pressing, losing a substantial share of their water and concentrating everything else. Valpolicella is made from the same varieties pressed fresh. It is the clearest illustration of appassimento in European wine.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fuller and richer: high against low-medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Valpolicellalow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is rounder and creamier in texture: high against low-medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against low-medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Valpolicellatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is stronger and warmer: high against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Valpolicella is fresher: high against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Earthy character: Similar — both low.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionAmarone della ValpolicellaValpolicella
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C13–15°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, raisin, bitter chocolate, cinnamonsour cherry, red plum, almond, violet, herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more