Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Valpolicella vs Ripasso

What does "ripasso" do to the wine?

The short answer

Valpolicella and Valpolicella Ripasso are both made from Corvina, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Valpolicella Ripasso has more body; Valpolicella Ripasso has more spice; Valpolicella Ripasso has more texture.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Valpolicella

Choose Valpolicella if you want something fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Valpolicella Ripasso

Choose Valpolicella Ripasso if you want something fuller and richer, spicier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Worth knowing

Ripasso means re-passing the young wine over the pressed skins left from Amarone. It picks up colour, alcohol and body, landing between a light Valpolicella and a full Amarone — which is exactly why it is sometimes called baby Amarone.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is fuller and richer: medium-plus against low-medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Valpolicellalow (1/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is spicier: medium against low.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against low-medium.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Valpolicellalow (1/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Valpolicella is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is more tannic and structured: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionValpolicellaValpolicella Ripasso
Bodytypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Texturetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at13–15°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, red plum, almond, violet, herbssour cherry, dried fig, cinnamon, plum, bitter chocolate

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more