Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Amarone della Valpolicella vs Cahors

How Amarone della Valpolicella and Cahors differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Amarone della Valpolicella has more spice; Cahors has more earthy character; Amarone della Valpolicella has more fruit intensity.

Choose

Amarone della Valpolicella

Choose Amarone della Valpolicella if you want something spicier, fruitier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Choose

Cahors

Choose Cahors if you want something earthier, more floral.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Cahorslow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Amarone della Valpolicellalow (1/5)
Cahorstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Cahors is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Cahorstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fruitier: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Amarone della Valpolicellalow (1/5)
Cahorstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Cahors is more floral: medium against low.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Cahorstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Cahorslow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionAmarone della ValpolicellaCahors
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, raisin, bitter chocolate, cinnamondamson, blackberry, tobacco, iron, graphite

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more