Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Amarone della Valpolicella vs Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

How Amarone della Valpolicella and Chianti Classico Gran Selezione differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Amarone della Valpolicella and Chianti Classico Gran Selezione come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Amarone della Valpolicella has more spice; Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more earthy character; Amarone della Valpolicella has more sweetness.

Choose

Amarone della Valpolicella

Choose Amarone della Valpolicella if you want something spicier, sweeter, stronger and warmer.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Amarone della Valpolicellalow (1/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionAmarone della ValpolicellaChianti Classico Gran Selezione
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, raisin, bitter chocolate, cinnamonblack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espresso

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more