Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Amarone della Valpolicella vs Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon

How Amarone della Valpolicella and Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Amarone della Valpolicella has more spice; Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Amarone della Valpolicella has more sweetness.

Choose

Amarone della Valpolicella

Choose Amarone della Valpolicella if you want something spicier, sweeter, stronger and warmer.

Choose

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Amarone della Valpolicellalow (1/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionAmarone della ValpolicellaCoonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, raisin, bitter chocolate, cinnamoncassis, mint, eucalyptus, blackcurrant leaf, cedar

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more