Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Amarone della Valpolicella vs Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon

How Amarone della Valpolicella and Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Amarone della Valpolicella has more sweetness; Amarone della Valpolicella has more acidity; Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon has more oak influence.

Choose

Amarone della Valpolicella

Choose Amarone della Valpolicella if you want something sweeter, fresher and more acidic, more savoury.

Choose

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more oaky, more herbal and green.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Amarone della Valpolicellalow (1/5)
Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignontypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: low-medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both high.
  • Body: Similar — both high.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionAmarone della ValpolicellaNapa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, raisin, bitter chocolate, cinnamoncassis, black cherry, cocoa, vanilla, cedar

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more