Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Amarone della Valpolicella vs Pinotage

How Amarone della Valpolicella and Pinotage differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Pinotage has more earthy character; Amarone della Valpolicella has more alcohol; Amarone della Valpolicella has more body.

Choose

Amarone della Valpolicella

Choose Amarone della Valpolicella if you want something stronger and warmer, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Choose

Pinotage

Choose Pinotage if you want something earthier, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Amarone della Valpolicellalow (1/5)
Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Pinotage is earthier: medium against low.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)

Pinotage is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionAmarone della ValpolicellaPinotage
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, raisin, bitter chocolate, cinnamonbramble, plum, smoke, coffee, dark chocolate

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more