Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Amarone della Valpolicella vs Saperavi

How Amarone della Valpolicella and Saperavi differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Saperavi has more earthy character; Saperavi has more acidity; Amarone della Valpolicella has more alcohol.

Choose

Amarone della Valpolicella

Choose Amarone della Valpolicella if you want something stronger and warmer, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Choose

Saperavi

Choose Saperavi if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Amarone della Valpolicellalow (1/5)
Saperavitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Saperavi is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Saperavitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Saperavi is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Saperavitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionAmarone della ValpolicellaSaperavi
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, raisin, bitter chocolate, cinnamondamson, sour plum, blackcurrant, liquorice, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more