Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Amarone della Valpolicella vs Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

How Amarone della Valpolicella and Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Amarone della Valpolicella has more spice; Amarone della Valpolicella has more sweetness; Amarone della Valpolicella has more acidity.

Choose

Amarone della Valpolicella

Choose Amarone della Valpolicella if you want something spicier, sweeter, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both high.
  • Body: Similar — both high.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionAmarone della ValpolicellaSonoma Cabernet Sauvignon
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, raisin, bitter chocolate, cinnamonblack cherry, cassis, cedar, vanilla, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more