Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Amarone della Valpolicella vs Zinfandel

How Amarone della Valpolicella and Zinfandel differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Amarone della Valpolicella has more savoury character; Amarone della Valpolicella has more acidity; Amarone della Valpolicella has more tannin.

Choose

Amarone della Valpolicella

Choose Amarone della Valpolicella if you want something more savoury, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Zinfandel

Choose Zinfandel if you prefer its flavour profile — blackberry, raspberry jam, black pepper.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is more savoury: medium-plus against low-medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Amarone della Valpolicellatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Amarone della Valpolicella is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both high.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionAmarone della ValpolicellaZinfandel
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, raisin, bitter chocolate, cinnamonblackberry, raspberry jam, black pepper, cinnamon, raisin

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more