Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barbaresco vs Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

How Barbaresco and Washington Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Barbaresco has more floral character; Barbaresco has more earthy character; Washington Cabernet Sauvignon has more fruit intensity.

Choose

Barbaresco

Choose Barbaresco if you want something more floral, earthier, more aromatic.

Choose

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Washington Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something fruitier, spicier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Barbarescotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Barbaresco is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Barbarescotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Barbaresco is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Barbarescotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: high against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Barbarescotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignonmedium (3/5)

Barbaresco is more aromatic: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Barbarescolow (1/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Cabernet Sauvignon is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Barbarescotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Barbaresco is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Perceived freshness: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionBarbarescoWashington Cabernet Sauvignon
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)medium (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, rose, tar, liquorice, dried herbsblackcurrant, black cherry, cocoa, graphite, sage

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more