Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barossa Shiraz vs Brunello di Montalcino

How Barossa Shiraz and Brunello di Montalcino differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Brunello di Montalcino has more earthy character; Brunello di Montalcino has more acidity; Brunello di Montalcino has more savoury character.

Choose

Barossa Shiraz

Choose Barossa Shiraz if you want something stronger and warmer.

Choose

Brunello di Montalcino

Choose Brunello di Montalcino if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Barossa Shirazlow (1/5)
Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Brunello di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Brunello di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is more savoury: high against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Barossa Shiraztypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is fresher: medium-plus against low-medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Brunello di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barossa Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Spice: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBarossa ShirazBrunello di Montalcino
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, plum, dark chocolate, liquorice, vanillablack cherry, leather, dried herbs, tobacco, espresso

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more