Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cru Beaujolais vs California Pinot Noir

How Cru Beaujolais and California Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cru Beaujolais has more floral character; California Pinot Noir has more spice; Cru Beaujolais has more perceived freshness.

Choose

Cru Beaujolais

Choose Cru Beaujolais if you want something more floral, fresher.

Choose

California Pinot Noir

Choose California Pinot Noir if you want something spicier, stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
California Pinot Noirlow (1/5)

Cru Beaujolais is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Cru Beaujolaislow (1/5)
California Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

California Pinot Noir is spicier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Cru Beaujolaistypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
California Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cru Beaujolais is fresher: high against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
California Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

California Pinot Noir is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
California Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

California Pinot Noir is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
California Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

California Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionCru BeaujolaisCalifornia Pinot Noir
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at14–16°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, violet, granite, raspberry, irisdark cherry, raspberry, cola, baking spice, vanilla

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more