Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cru Beaujolais vs Chianti Classico

How Cru Beaujolais and Chianti Classico differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cru Beaujolais has more floral character; Chianti Classico has more herbal / green character; Chianti Classico has more acidity.

Choose

Cru Beaujolais

Choose Cru Beaujolais if you want something more floral.

Choose

Chianti Classico

Choose Chianti Classico if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Chianti Classicolow (1/5)

Cru Beaujolais is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Cru Beaujolaislow (1/5)
Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Chianti Classicotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Chianti Classico is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Spice: Similar — both low.
  • Earthy character: Similar — both medium.
  • Perceived freshness: Similar — both high.

Full side by side

DimensionCru BeaujolaisChianti Classico
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, violet, granite, raspberry, irissour cherry, tomato leaf, dried oregano, leather, balsamic

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more