Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cru Beaujolais vs Chianti Classico Riserva

How Cru Beaujolais and Chianti Classico Riserva differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cru Beaujolais has more floral character; Chianti Classico Riserva has more savoury character; Chianti Classico Riserva has more herbal / green character.

Choose

Cru Beaujolais

Choose Cru Beaujolais if you want something more floral.

Choose

Chianti Classico Riserva

Choose Chianti Classico Riserva if you want something more savoury, more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Chianti Classico Riservalow (1/5)

Cru Beaujolais is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Riservatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is more savoury: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Cru Beaujolaislow (1/5)
Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Chianti Classico Riservatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Spice: Similar — both low.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.
  • Texture: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionCru BeaujolaisChianti Classico Riserva
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, violet, granite, raspberry, irissour cherry, leather, dried herbs, tobacco, balsamic

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more