Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cru Beaujolais vs Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

How Cru Beaujolais and Montepulciano d’Abruzzo differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cru Beaujolais has more floral character; Cru Beaujolais has more earthy character; Cru Beaujolais has more perceived freshness.

Choose

Cru Beaujolais

Choose Cru Beaujolais if you want something more floral, earthier, fresher.

Choose

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

Choose Montepulciano d’Abruzzo if you want something stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)

Cru Beaujolais is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)

Cru Beaujolais is earthier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Cru Beaujolaistypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Cru Beaujolais is fresher: high against medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cru Beaujolais is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low-medium.

Full side by side

DimensionCru BeaujolaisMontepulciano d’Abruzzo
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, violet, granite, raspberry, irisblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoa

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more