Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cru Beaujolais vs New Zealand Pinot Noir

How Cru Beaujolais and New Zealand Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cru Beaujolais has more floral character; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more herbal / green character; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more spice.

Choose

Cru Beaujolais

Choose Cru Beaujolais if you want something more floral.

Choose

New Zealand Pinot Noir

Choose New Zealand Pinot Noir if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, stronger and warmer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirlow (1/5)

Cru Beaujolais is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Cru Beaujolaislow (1/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Cru Beaujolaislow (1/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is spicier: medium against low.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Earthy character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionCru BeaujolaisNew Zealand Pinot Noir
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at14–16°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, violet, granite, raspberry, irisdark cherry, plum, thyme, violet, clove

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more