Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cru Beaujolais vs Hawke’s Bay Syrah

How Cru Beaujolais and Hawke’s Bay Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more spice; Cru Beaujolais has more earthy character; Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more tannin.

Choose

Cru Beaujolais

Choose Cru Beaujolais if you want something earthier.

Choose

Hawke’s Bay Syrah

Choose Hawke’s Bay Syrah if you want something spicier, more tannic and structured, stronger and warmer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Cru Beaujolaislow (1/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is spicier: high against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)

Cru Beaujolais is earthier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Cru Beaujolaistypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionCru BeaujolaisHawke’s Bay Syrah
Spicelow (1/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, violet, granite, raspberry, irisblackberry, black pepper, violet, olive, plum

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more