Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cru Beaujolais vs Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

How Cru Beaujolais and Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more acidity; Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more alcohol; Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more oak influence.

Choose

Cru Beaujolais

Choose Cru Beaujolais if you want something more floral.

Choose

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

Choose Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir if you want something fresher and more acidic, stronger and warmer, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Cru Beaujolaistypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cru Beaujolais is more floral: medium-plus against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Body: Similar — both medium.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionCru BeaujolaisSonoma Coast Pinot Noir
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, violet, granite, raspberry, irisred cherry, cranberry, forest floor, blood orange, sea spray

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more