Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cru Beaujolais vs Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

How Cru Beaujolais and Vino Nobile di Montepulciano differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cru Beaujolais has more floral character; Vino Nobile di Montepulciano has more acidity; Vino Nobile di Montepulciano has more tannin.

Choose

Cru Beaujolais

Choose Cru Beaujolais if you want something more floral, fruitier.

Choose

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

Choose Vino Nobile di Montepulciano if you want something fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured, stronger and warmer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Cru Beaujolais is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cru Beaujolais is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Spice: Similar — both low.
  • Earthy character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionCru BeaujolaisVino Nobile di Montepulciano
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, violet, granite, raspberry, irissour cherry, plum, dried herbs, leather, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more