Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Bekaa Valley Red vs McLaren Vale Shiraz

How Bekaa Valley Red and McLaren Vale Shiraz differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Bekaa Valley Red and McLaren Vale Shiraz are the same variety under two names, so the difference is about where it is grown, how it is made and what each name has come to signal — not about the grape. The main differences: Bekaa Valley Red has more earthy character; Bekaa Valley Red has more acidity; McLaren Vale Shiraz has more alcohol.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Bekaa Valley Red

Choose Bekaa Valley Red if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more savoury.

Choose

McLaren Vale Shiraz

Choose McLaren Vale Shiraz if you want something stronger and warmer, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shirazlow (1/5)

Bekaa Valley Red is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Bekaa Valley Red is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

McLaren Vale Shiraz is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
McLaren Vale Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Bekaa Valley Red is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionBekaa Valley RedMcLaren Vale Shiraz
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnessmedium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, thyme, cedar, leatherblackberry, red plum, dark chocolate, sea salt, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more