Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Blaufränkisch vs Valpolicella Ripasso

How Blaufränkisch and Valpolicella Ripasso differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Blaufränkisch has more earthy character; Valpolicella Ripasso has more sweetness; Blaufränkisch has more acidity.

Choose

Blaufränkisch

Choose Blaufränkisch if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Valpolicella Ripasso

Choose Valpolicella Ripasso if you want something sweeter, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Valpolicella Ripassolow (1/5)

Blaufränkisch is earthier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Blaufränkischlow (1/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Blaufränkischtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Blaufränkisch is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Valpolicella Ripasso is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Valpolicella Ripassotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Blaufränkisch is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionBlaufränkischValpolicella Ripasso
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, blackberry, black pepper, graphite, violetsour cherry, dried fig, cinnamon, plum, bitter chocolate

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more