Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Blaufränkisch vs Syrah

Peppery, savoury, dark-fruited reds with firm acidity — the comparison most often used to explain Austrian red wine to someone who drinks northern Rhône.

The short answer

The main differences: Blaufränkisch has more acidity; Syrah has more body; Syrah has more aromatic intensity.

Choose

Blaufränkisch

Choose Blaufränkisch if you want something fresher and more acidic, fresher.

Choose

Syrah

Choose Syrah if you want something fuller and richer, more aromatic, more savoury.

Worth knowing

Both carry black pepper and both keep acidity, which is where the comparison earns its place. Blaufränkisch is lighter in body and more sour-cherried; Syrah is denser and more overtly meaty. Cool-climate Syrah is the closer match; Barossa Shiraz is not really in the same conversation.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Blaufränkischtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Syrah is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Blaufränkischmedium (3/5)
Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Syrah is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)

Syrah is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Blaufränkischlow (1/5)
Syrahtypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Syrah is more floral: low-medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBlaufränkischSyrah
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, blackberry, black pepper, graphite, violetblackberry, black pepper, olive, cured meat, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more